What are the limitations of oral traditions?

Some information may be forgotten or omitted. They may not be correct dates or chronology of events. It is an expensive method since one has to pay for information. It is time consuming since one requires a lot of time to interview one individual.

What are the disadvantages of oral tradition as a source of history?

People’s ability to remember facts is limited. The information may be subjected to distortions. It is likely to have people biases / exaggerations. The information may change over a period of time.

What are the problems of oral history?

These issues —the subjectivity of all knowledge, time consciousness, openness to experience, intersubjectivity, and memory, as well as other issues not discussed here—permeate phenomenological writing, and the implications for oral history are clear.

Why is oral traditional an unreliable source of historical information?

Oral traditions could be used to justify situations or claims in the present. This has often led to distortions and fabrications. Another noticeable problem is that of chronology. While written sources may be precise in dates, oral traditions provide no absolute dates.

What is oral tradition as a source of history?

Oral tradition is the collection of information through the word of mouth from generation to generation. Of course, oral tradition is a reliable source of historical writing. . These are actually historical accounts that are transmitted from one generation to the next through word of mouth.

What are the strength and weakness of oral tradition?

A strength of oral tradition is that it is being told from word of mouth and more people will listen to a good storyteller than to go read a book about the history. However, a weakness of oral tradition is that many of the stories get forgotten, left out, or embellished.

What are the oral sources of history?

Oral histories are accounts given by a person of events earlier in their life. Often, they are taken by family members, historians, archivists, or others who interview older people in an attempt to document events and lives that might otherwise be forgotten. Oral histories are valuable.

Is oral tradition a reliable source of historical writing?

Oral tradition is a reliable source of historical writing. However, the historian must be cautious of some factors, such as the need to be patient to go to the root of the oral tradition in order to ensure that the facts collected and gathered are authentic and genuine.

What is the danger of not passing on information from generation to generation?

The danger of not passing information from generation to generation is that the culture and values of our tradition may extinct. People will have to survive a meaningless life without their cultural and traditional values.

Is oral tradition a reliable source of history?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=60eHIxjUlN0